As a bonus point, which I forgot to mention, the speech from Richard II uses both deposéd and deposed.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Being the weblog of Mark Forsyth
Subscribe To
Posts
Comments
The Most Popular Posts of the Inky Fool
-
This post has already gone up twice; but, as it's the one on which I worked hardest, and as this blog is always gaining and losing adh... -
Just a brief post as I'm running round the country giving talks (Booka Books in Oswestry tonight). I met a German-speaking lady in Edin...
-
Because of all the attention this post is getting, I ought to point out that I was not intending to disclose some outrageous Orwellian con...
-
I've been staying in the flat of an American friend and found amongst his books an American-English dictionary . It is a slim volume, a... -
A poop-noddy is defined in the Oxford English Dictionary as: Sexual intercourse (rare) I don't know about you, dear reader, but I... -
Here is the updated list of the fifty most quoted lines of poetry on the internet, including all the readers' suggestions. We started ... -
If I wish to do an impression of a Chinese chap, I will not allow myself to be hampered by the fact that I don't speak a word of Mandar... -
Pluto was the god of the underworld. He was also the god of wealth. That is why we have plutocracy (government by the wealthy), plutocrats ... -
Back when I was writing The Horologicon , there was one word that I desperately wanted to include. But I couldn't because I didn't ...
This lesson raised a point I've been wondering about throughout this series.
ReplyDeleteFor the example of trochaic substitution at the 2nd foot of a line you used "For God's sake let us sit upon the ground". When you're using one syllable words like sake and let, how do you determine whether the word is stressed or not?
It's largely the "a cup of tea" rule from the first lesson. You naturally emphasise nouns over articles, for example. I've never heard an actor not stress "sake", and it would be weird to stress "let" more.
Delete